|
Meeting at the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia last week, activists
gathered to send Senator Specter a list of 100 reasons Pennsylvanians
oppose drilling in ANWR and to raise awareness of the debate. Previously,
Specter had said he was surprised so many Pennsylvanians seemed
concerned with the issue. Shana Starobin of the Pennsylvania Public
Interest Research Group says just because Alaska is far away, doesn't
mean Pennsylvanians don't care.
"We've been working together with local labor groups across
the state, religious organizations, sportsman groups, to protect
this refuge because we just think the arctic is a beautiful, pristine,
wilderness area" says Starobin.
But some groups in the state say the economic benefits of drilling
outweigh the environmental risks. John Schmitt, of the Teamsters
Union, says opening up ANWR for drilling could mean jobs.
"Pennsylvania Vendors that do business in Alaska oil fields,
right now there's more than 200 of them," says Schmitt. "Examples
would be manufacturing of pipe and piping supplies, computer equipment
and software, and oil and gas field equipment and supplies.
Schmitt says the number of jobs created would more than justify
any environmental risks. He also says the amount of space that would
be open for drilling would only be a small percentage of ANWR land
and it would only be drilled in the winter.
Other proponents of drilling say it's not about jobs or wildlife,
but national security. Bruce Harder, spokesperson for the Veterans
of Foreign Wars, says "at this time with the war on terrorism
on going and the instability in the middle east, it just makes good
common sense to try to get ourselves in a position where we can
use the reserves that we do have if we need them."
In addition to exploring domestic oil resources, Harder says the
U.S. should look into alternatives such as wind and solar power
as ways to reduce dependency on foreign fuel.
Emily Ferry, an organizer with the Alaska Coalition of Pennsylvania,
agrees with Harder concerning the need to develop stronger alternative
energy strategies. But she says that wind and solar power should
be looked at as alternatives to drilling in ANWR, not in conjunction
with it. Ferry says the bill up for debate in the Senate this week
is crucial.
"We had Representative Greenwood, who's a Republican from
Pennsylvania, vote to protect the arctic refuge" says Ferry.
"And in the Senate, there's many Republicans that are standing
up and saying 'no, it's not worth drilling here, it's not worth
the loss of this wild area.'"
Ferry says Specter should stand with those in his party that have
voted against drilling in the past, and who have announced publicly
that they are against it. Ferry and other participants at the rally
urged visitors to contact Specter's office and make their opinions
known before the Senate begins discussion of the energy bill this
Tuesday.
|